Line 67: |
Line 67: |
| | | |
| This has some interesting implications. | | This has some interesting implications. |
− | * Sugar code doesn't have to keep a .xol and a Library directory in sync, installing and uninstalling the lattr | + | * Sugar code doesn't have to keep a .xol and a Library directory in sync, installing and uninstalling the latter as .xols are opened and erased. |
− | * The file system ensures uniqueness of content bundles | + | * The file system determines if a content bundle conflicts with another. |
| * Instead of making web pages telling readers how great some content is, they can view it for themselves before they download. | | * Instead of making web pages telling readers how great some content is, they can view it for themselves before they download. |
| | | |
− | === Limitations ===
| + | There are limitations to this: |
| * Some collections have an index.html that does a meta http-equiv refresh to a path in file:///home/olpc/Library , this won't work (and I think breaks anyway in other Sugar environments) | | * Some collections have an index.html that does a meta http-equiv refresh to a path in file:///home/olpc/Library , this won't work (and I think breaks anyway in other Sugar environments) |
| * Some collections (Biology, NatureImages, TranslationDictionary) reference a /usr/share/library-common/css/master.css). This won't work if you browse them remotely. | | * Some collections (Biology, NatureImages, TranslationDictionary) reference a /usr/share/library-common/css/master.css). This won't work if you browse them remotely. |
| * I don't know what the performance implications are. I know Firefox 3.6 has additional performance boosts as Mozilla moved more files into a single runtime .jar file. | | * I don't know what the performance implications are. I know Firefox 3.6 has additional performance boosts as Mozilla moved more files into a single runtime .jar file. |
| + | -- [[User:Skierpage|Skierpage]] 06:40, 4 September 2010 (EDT) |