Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 67: Line 67:     
This has some interesting implications.
 
This has some interesting implications.
* Sugar code doesn't have to keep a .xol and a Library directory in sync, installing and uninstalling the lattr
+
* Sugar code doesn't have to keep a .xol and a Library directory in sync, installing and uninstalling the latter as .xols are opened and erased.
* The file system ensures uniqueness of content bundles
+
* The file system determines if a content bundle conflicts with another.
 
* Instead of making web pages telling readers how great some content is, they can view it for themselves before they download.
 
* Instead of making web pages telling readers how great some content is, they can view it for themselves before they download.
   −
=== Limitations ===
+
There are limitations to this:
 
* Some collections have an index.html that does a meta http-equiv refresh to a path in file:///home/olpc/Library , this won't work (and I think breaks anyway in other Sugar environments)
 
* Some collections have an index.html that does a meta http-equiv refresh to a path in file:///home/olpc/Library , this won't work (and I think breaks anyway in other Sugar environments)
 
* Some collections (Biology, NatureImages, TranslationDictionary) reference a /usr/share/library-common/css/master.css).  This won't work if you browse them remotely.
 
* Some collections (Biology, NatureImages, TranslationDictionary) reference a /usr/share/library-common/css/master.css).  This won't work if you browse them remotely.
 
* I don't know what the performance implications are.  I know Firefox 3.6 has additional performance boosts as Mozilla moved more files into a single runtime .jar file.
 
* I don't know what the performance implications are.  I know Firefox 3.6 has additional performance boosts as Mozilla moved more files into a single runtime .jar file.
 +
-- [[User:Skierpage|Skierpage]] 06:40, 4 September 2010 (EDT)

Navigation menu