Changes

Testing/Reports/Sweets on Raspberry pi armhf raspbian (view source)

Revision as of 08:31, 12 July 2012

1,427 bytes added , 08:31, 12 July 2012

review progress

Line 52: Line 52:

xulrunner-1.9.2

+

'''Review progress'''

+

So I believe I can fulfill all the dependencies of the four <sweets> options, sdk: 0.88, 0.94, and dextrose: 0.88, 0.94, so far as is revealed by:

+

sweets status --deps <those four sweets>

+

1. This error message keeps appearing:

+

ls: cannot access /usr/lib*/xulrunner-1.*: No such file or directory

+

''- is xulrunner fundamental to the task?''

+

These are the remaining problem dependencies for -S option.

+

2. error status "dr" sdk/pyabiword (0.8.0-11).

+

Aptitude shows python-abiword 0.8.0-11 installed.

+

3. error status "dr" sdk/hulahop (0.8.2-7)

+

E: Package 'python-hulahop' has no installation candidate

+

Package: python-hulahop (0.8.1-1) is shown in Debian package search as unavailable in armhf

+

4. error status "dr" sdk/pyxpcom (1.9.2-15) (<2)

+

Package: python-xpcom (1:9.0~hg20111212-2 and others)

+

Aptitude shows python-xpcom 1:9.0~hg20111212 ''but it is out of specified range.''

+

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_PyXPCOM ''refers''

+

5. error status "er" http://sweets.sugarlabs.org/sdk/xulrunner (>=1.9.2, <1.9.3)

+

Package, squeeze: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.16-16) [security]

+

Package, sid: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.19-2 and others)

+

Package, wheezy, xulrunner-10.0 ''Is available, armhf: testing in progress''.

+

''All are out of specified range.''

+

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner_1.9.2_Release_Notes ''Refers, attempted and failed to install, (i686 source)''

+

'''As a known issue''' (for Debian), suggested dependencies, i.e., -S sweets command argument, don't work for now. The reason why the -S option does not work in Debian is probably fundamental to making the above process more easy to complete.

Inkyfingers

687

edits