Line 52: |
Line 52: |
| | | |
| xulrunner-1.9.2 | | xulrunner-1.9.2 |
| + | |
| + | '''Review progress''' |
| + | |
| + | So I believe I can fulfill all the dependencies of the four <sweets> options, sdk: 0.88, 0.94, and dextrose: 0.88, 0.94, so far as is revealed by: |
| + | |
| + | sweets status --deps <those four sweets> |
| + | |
| + | 1. This error message keeps appearing: |
| + | |
| + | ls: cannot access /usr/lib*/xulrunner-1.*: No such file or directory |
| + | |
| + | ''- is xulrunner fundamental to the task?'' |
| + | |
| + | These are the remaining problem dependencies for -S option. |
| + | |
| + | 2. error status "dr" sdk/pyabiword (0.8.0-11). |
| + | |
| + | Aptitude shows python-abiword 0.8.0-11 installed. |
| + | |
| + | 3. error status "dr" sdk/hulahop (0.8.2-7) |
| + | |
| + | E: Package 'python-hulahop' has no installation candidate |
| + | |
| + | Package: python-hulahop (0.8.1-1) is shown in Debian package search as unavailable in armhf |
| + | |
| + | 4. error status "dr" sdk/pyxpcom (1.9.2-15) (<2) |
| + | |
| + | Package: python-xpcom (1:9.0~hg20111212-2 and others) |
| + | |
| + | Aptitude shows python-xpcom 1:9.0~hg20111212 ''but it is out of specified range.'' |
| + | |
| + | https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Building_PyXPCOM ''refers'' |
| + | |
| + | 5. error status "er" http://sweets.sugarlabs.org/sdk/xulrunner (>=1.9.2, <1.9.3) |
| + | |
| + | Package, squeeze: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.16-16) [security] |
| + | |
| + | Package, sid: xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.19-2 and others) |
| + | |
| + | Package, wheezy, xulrunner-10.0 ''Is available, armhf: testing in progress''. |
| + | |
| + | ''All are out of specified range.'' |
| + | |
| + | https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner_1.9.2_Release_Notes ''Refers, attempted and failed to install, (i686 source)'' |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| | | |
| '''As a known issue''' (for Debian), suggested dependencies, i.e., -S sweets command argument, don't work for now. The reason why the -S option does not work in Debian is probably fundamental to making the above process more easy to complete. | | '''As a known issue''' (for Debian), suggested dependencies, i.e., -S sweets command argument, don't work for now. The reason why the -S option does not work in Debian is probably fundamental to making the above process more easy to complete. |