Bernie

Joined 6 May 2008
906 bytes added ,  10:59, 19 August 2008
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
= Bernie Innocenti =
 +
 
[[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]]
 
[[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]]
   −
:Personal homepage: http://www.codewiz.org/
   
:e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org
 
:e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org
 
:IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet
 
:IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet
:Old OLPC projects: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild
+
:Jabber: bernie AT codewiz DOT org (yes, I run my own Jabber server ;-)
 +
:Contact info: http://www.codewiz.org/ContactInformation
 +
 
 +
:Personal homepage: http://www.codewiz.org/
 +
:Blog: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/
 +
:Resume: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/CurriculumVitae (somewhat outdated)
 +
:LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=5159373
 +
:Old OLPC projects: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild
   −
I'm a volunteer working for the Sugar Labs team.
+
I'm a volunteer working for the [[Sugar Labs]] team.
    
Until February 2008, I was a full-time volunteer developer at OLPC.  My job was hacking X, the base Fedora OS, the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work.  Later on, until April 2008, I was CTO of OLPC Europe and traveled around to present our project to government officials and dignitaries.  Curremtly, I'm a volunteer at [http://www.olenepal.org/ | OLE Nepal] in Kathmandu, Nepal.
 
Until February 2008, I was a full-time volunteer developer at OLPC.  My job was hacking X, the base Fedora OS, the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work.  Later on, until April 2008, I was CTO of OLPC Europe and traveled around to present our project to government officials and dignitaries.  Curremtly, I'm a volunteer at [http://www.olenepal.org/ | OLE Nepal] in Kathmandu, Nepal.
    +
== Platform ==
 +
 +
To position itself as THE educational environment of the future, Sugar needs
 +
to grow a larger user and developer base.  This is only possible by
 +
transforming Sugar into a truly community-driven project with its own
 +
independent identity.
 +
 +
=== Goals for Sugar Labs ===
 +
 +
1. Enhance our public-facing web presence and development infrastructure;
 +
 +
2. Attract contribution from multiple hardware and OS vendors;
 +
 +
3. Foster the creation of companies and groups offering professional Sugar
 +
consulting and outsourcing.
 +
 +
4. Raise funding to sponsor developer meetings and our presence at major
 +
international events
 +
 +
 +
=== Anti-goals for Sugar Labs ===
 +
 +
1. Hire a large team of software developers -- This would end up discouraging
 +
outside contributors;
 +
 +
2. Brew a custom OS platform -- We work with distributors, not compete against
 +
them;
 +
 +
3. Let Sugar Labs become unfairly biased towards specific partners --
 +
that would undermine our relationships with other partners;
   −
== Why we should be more open ==
+
4. Trade project autonomy for funding or support -- we're glad to offer our
 +
services, not our souls.
   −
(I wrote the following note in 2007, while still working at 1cc)
     −
Openness will be our greatest and most lasting strength.  If we shy away
+
=== Personal agenda ===
from it now it will never return.
  −
  -- [[User:Sj|Samuel Klein]]
     −
"We should be more open" may strike many as a surprising suggestion
+
I'm exploring the possibility to build a small team of Sugar hackers that
for OLPC, since it's already supposed to be one of the most open
+
would offer consulting services such as porting to specific hardware
projects out there.
+
platforms or development of features.  Internet would be our office.
   −
But opening just the source code without opening the rest of the
+
Over the next few years, computers will become central in world education.
development process to the community is a recurring pitfall in which
+
This will in turn stimulate the creation of a florid industry offering
even large corporates such as RedHat and Sun all fell, initially.
+
hardware, software and contents for the specific needs of schools.
I see us likely to fall into the same circular thinking that
  −
"trying to involve external contributors does not pay off
  −
because, so far, we've got so little external contributions".
     −
I've heard the argument that "working on our platform would
+
Sugar has a large competitive advantage over any other proprietary
be too hard for outside contributors".  This can't possibly be
+
offering on the horizon, and a huge momentum.  This is why I also see
true: projects like OpenWRT and the Linux kernel and dozens of
+
Sugar as a rewarding business opportunity to invest in.
RTOS projects out there regularly attract flocks of hackers who
  −
are very capable of working on all kinds of fancy and undocumented
  −
hardware and exotic OSes, with great results.
     −
My access point can now play MP3s :-)
+
See also [Why open]