Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | = Bernie Innocenti = |
| + | |
| [[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]] | | [[Image:Bernie.png|thumb|none|not really me]] |
| | | |
− | :Personal homepage: http://www.codewiz.org/
| |
| :e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org | | :e-mail: bernie AT codewiz DOT org |
| :IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet | | :IRC: _bernie, hanging on #sugar on FreeNet |
− | :Old OLPC projects: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild | + | :Jabber: bernie AT codewiz DOT org (yes, I run my own Jabber server ;-) |
| + | :Contact info: http://www.codewiz.org/ContactInformation |
| + | |
| + | :Personal homepage: http://www.codewiz.org/ |
| + | :Blog: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/ |
| + | :Resume: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/CurriculumVitae (somewhat outdated) |
| + | :LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=5159373 |
| + | :Old OLPC projects: http://www.codewiz.org/wiki/OneLaptopPerChild |
| | | |
− | I'm a volunteer working for the Sugar Labs team. | + | I'm a volunteer working for the [[Sugar Labs]] team. |
| | | |
| Until February 2008, I was a full-time volunteer developer at OLPC. My job was hacking X, the base Fedora OS, the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work. Later on, until April 2008, I was CTO of OLPC Europe and traveled around to present our project to government officials and dignitaries. Curremtly, I'm a volunteer at [http://www.olenepal.org/ | OLE Nepal] in Kathmandu, Nepal. | | Until February 2008, I was a full-time volunteer developer at OLPC. My job was hacking X, the base Fedora OS, the Linux kernel, some i18n and input work. Later on, until April 2008, I was CTO of OLPC Europe and traveled around to present our project to government officials and dignitaries. Curremtly, I'm a volunteer at [http://www.olenepal.org/ | OLE Nepal] in Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| | | |
| + | == Platform == |
| + | |
| + | To position itself as THE educational environment of the future, Sugar needs |
| + | to grow a larger user and developer base. This is only possible by |
| + | transforming Sugar into a truly community-driven project with its own |
| + | independent identity. |
| + | |
| + | === Goals for Sugar Labs === |
| + | |
| + | 1. Enhance our public-facing web presence and development infrastructure; |
| + | |
| + | 2. Attract contribution from multiple hardware and OS vendors; |
| + | |
| + | 3. Foster the creation of companies and groups offering professional Sugar |
| + | consulting and outsourcing. |
| + | |
| + | 4. Raise funding to sponsor developer meetings and our presence at major |
| + | international events |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | === Anti-goals for Sugar Labs === |
| + | |
| + | 1. Hire a large team of software developers -- This would end up discouraging |
| + | outside contributors; |
| + | |
| + | 2. Brew a custom OS platform -- We work with distributors, not compete against |
| + | them; |
| + | |
| + | 3. Let Sugar Labs become unfairly biased towards specific partners -- |
| + | that would undermine our relationships with other partners; |
| | | |
− | == Why we should be more open ==
| + | 4. Trade project autonomy for funding or support -- we're glad to offer our |
| + | services, not our souls. |
| | | |
− | (I wrote the following note in 2007, while still working at 1cc)
| |
| | | |
− | Openness will be our greatest and most lasting strength. If we shy away
| + | === Personal agenda === |
− | from it now it will never return.
| |
− | -- [[User:Sj|Samuel Klein]]
| |
| | | |
− | "We should be more open" may strike many as a surprising suggestion
| + | I'm exploring the possibility to build a small team of Sugar hackers that |
− | for OLPC, since it's already supposed to be one of the most open
| + | would offer consulting services such as porting to specific hardware |
− | projects out there.
| + | platforms or development of features. Internet would be our office. |
| | | |
− | But opening just the source code without opening the rest of the
| + | Over the next few years, computers will become central in world education. |
− | development process to the community is a recurring pitfall in which
| + | This will in turn stimulate the creation of a florid industry offering |
− | even large corporates such as RedHat and Sun all fell, initially.
| + | hardware, software and contents for the specific needs of schools. |
− | I see us likely to fall into the same circular thinking that
| |
− | "trying to involve external contributors does not pay off
| |
− | because, so far, we've got so little external contributions".
| |
| | | |
− | I've heard the argument that "working on our platform would
| + | Sugar has a large competitive advantage over any other proprietary |
− | be too hard for outside contributors". This can't possibly be
| + | offering on the horizon, and a huge momentum. This is why I also see |
− | true: projects like OpenWRT and the Linux kernel and dozens of
| + | Sugar as a rewarding business opportunity to invest in. |
− | RTOS projects out there regularly attract flocks of hackers who
| |
− | are very capable of working on all kinds of fancy and undocumented
| |
− | hardware and exotic OSes, with great results.
| |
| | | |
− | My access point can now play MP3s :-)
| + | See also [Why open] |