Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supported systems"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:I think at this time the table should only contain Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora. The other distributions/OS are not supported in any way. -- [[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]]
 
:I think at this time the table should only contain Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora. The other distributions/OS are not supported in any way. -- [[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]]
 
::We better try to define ''supported''. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 
::We better try to define ''supported''. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 +
:::I think at very minimum ''supported'' should involve availability of binary packages. Only Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora meet that requirement. -- [[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]]

Revision as of 03:58, 28 May 2008

Tested?

What do these tables represent? Distros on which Sugar is bundled? Distros on which Sugar *can* run, with the necessary dependencies? --Morgs 08:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The former, at least in the case of Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora. But maybe we need to add another column to the table. --Walter 11:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at this time the table should only contain Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora. The other distributions/OS are not supported in any way. -- Marcopg
We better try to define supported. --Walter 02:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at very minimum supported should involve availability of binary packages. Only Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora meet that requirement. -- Marcopg