130
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 142:
Line 142: − + − + + Line 175:
Line 176: − + + Line 201:
Line 203: + − + +
Decision panels/SOAS/Report (view source)
Revision as of 20:30, 8 October 2009
, 20:30, 8 October 2009→Recorded opinions
==== Recorded opinions ====
==== Recorded opinions ====
=====Question 1=====
===== Question 1 =====
{| border="1"
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|+ Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing
|+ Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing
Sugar releases?"
Sugar releases?"
|-
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| No
!width="20%"| No
=====Question 2=====
=====Question 2=====
{| border="1"
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
|-
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| No
!width="20%"| No
# Daniel Drake
# Daniel Drake
|}
|}
=====Question 3=====
=====Question 3=====
{| border="1"
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"
|+ Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
|+ Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
|-
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| Yes
!width="20%"| No
!width="20%"| No