Changes

;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

;Answer: Consensus trending towards ''yes''.  There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Answer: Consensus trending towards '''yes'''.  There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

;Answer:  Consensus seems to be '''yes'''.  There are requests for clarification of how SL can promote effective ways of distributing Sugar, and endorse all good distributions.  [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Answer:  Consensus is '''yes'''.  There are requests for clarification of how SL can promote effective ways of distributing Sugar, and endorse all good distributions.  [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"