Karma/To-Do: Difference between revisions

ChristophD (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BryanWB (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The below is out of date but kept for history
<strike>
== Bryan ==
== Bryan ==
 
* clean up main karma repo
* add getopt.js to karma.js
* create dummy kindex.html w/ links to examples
* bundle in a basic browser and functionality to create xo bundles


== Christoph ==
== Christoph ==


* investigate licensing questions (list of files declaring the license okay?) => contact andriani,  
* investigate licensing questions (list of files declaring the license okay?) => (2009-07-21: contacted Andriani, will also do more research myself)
* browser solution for Sugar .xo bundle
** according to dsd we can simply include a LICENSE file in the top-directory and declare on a directory basis which licenses apply (jquery under MIT and GPL, Karma js code under MIT ''(?)'' and multimedia assets under CC-BY-SA)
* ask Roxan re; Firefox Cache directory should be empty - how to do that and re: changes done to Firefox (2009-07-13: will be done once Roshan returns on July 24)
* investigate browser solution for Sugar .xo bundle
* define requirements for browser for Sugar .xo bundles
** html 5 capable;-)
** integrate well with Sugar
*** on a visual level (or E-Paath fullscreen approach)
*** on a technical level: e.g. integration with Journal, DBUS, etc.)
** candidates
*** Surf-106.xo
*** E-Paath brower (based on Firefox-6.xo)
*** custom HTML/JavaScript renderer (browse?)
*** browse on the early Fedora 11 based XO-1 images supports HTML 5
* example of possible navigation and UI requirements
* Web sites to be read:
** http://opensource.sfsu.edu/node/654
** http://seleniumhq.org/


== Felipe ==
== Felipe ==
* Get "Adding Up to 10" working
* Add i18n to "Adding up to 10"
</strike>