Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-18"
(Created page with 'In attendance: SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting. == …') |
(→Guidelines re transactions with the SFC: forgot to add the link) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC === | === Guidelines re transactions with the SFC === | ||
− | Walter pointed to [[]] but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued. | + | Walter pointed to [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions]] but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued. |
=== Infrastructure proposal === | === Infrastructure proposal === |
Revision as of 12:35, 18 December 2009
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting.
Agenda
- Revisit Motion 4 from last week
- Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
- Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
- Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
- Infrastructure proposal
Revisit Motion 4 from last week
Motion 4 from last week in regard to Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality
As discussed in email after last week's meeting:
MOTION 1: Q2: Sugar Labs encourages all GNU/Linux distributions to package and distribute Sugar, and if possible will assist with hosting and infrastructure. SL Marketing may strategically decide to focus resources towards specific distributions in the interest of promoting Sugar more effectively.
Motion passes (7 for; 0 against)
Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
MOTION 2: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and process is put in place: SoaS will be the first project to go through that process.
Being voted on in email
Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued.
Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
Walter pointed to Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued.
Infrastructure proposal
We did not discuss Bernie's infrastructure proposal.
Next meeting
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 15:00 UTC