* Each Polyol component has its own release schedule, i.e., there are no Polyol official releases (it looks like in Gentoo).
* Each Polyol component has its own release schedule, i.e., there are no Polyol official releases (it looks like in Gentoo).
* Activities could use these libraries on separate basis e.g. activity could use recent ''gui'' (to get access to last UI widgets) and old version of ''ds'' (because activity was coded against this particular version and new version has backward compatibility breakage in API).
* Activities could use these libraries on separate basis e.g. activity could use recent ''gui'' (to get access to last UI widgets) and old version of ''ds'' (because activity was coded against this particular version and new version has backward compatibility breakage in API).
−
* Activities (mostly not native sugar activities) could use only one library e.g. activity could use only ''ds'' library thus do not fetch additional dependencies like telepathy (via ''collab'') and gtk+ (via ''gui'').
+
* Activities (mostly not native sugar activities) could use only one library e.g. activity could use only ''ds'' library thus do not fetch additional dependencies like gtk+ (via ''gui'').