Difference between revisions of "Sugar on a Stick/Activity Criteria/Status"
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
=== Add your own idea here === | === Add your own idea here === | ||
− | + | IDEA: Color code activities listed based on criteria fulfilled | |
Rationale: Gives a visual cue for developers that one or more criteria are not complete or accurate. | Rationale: Gives a visual cue for developers that one or more criteria are not complete or accurate. | ||
+ | |||
Test: Activities are listed in RED until each criteria has been addressed and filled in with an active link. | Test: Activities are listed in RED until each criteria has been addressed and filled in with an active link. | ||
+ | |||
Instructions: Add activity to list. Test each criteria and set status appropriately. When all criteria are fulfilled, color of activity changes to BLACK. | Instructions: Add activity to list. Test each criteria and set status appropriately. When all criteria are fulfilled, color of activity changes to BLACK. | ||
− | + | IDEA: Add +/- ranking to criteria in table | |
Rationale: Add ranking to criteria to encourage better documentation. | Rationale: Add ranking to criteria to encourage better documentation. | ||
+ | |||
Test: Validate if minimum criteria has been met. Subjective assessment follows to determine + or - ranking. | Test: Validate if minimum criteria has been met. Subjective assessment follows to determine + or - ranking. | ||
+ | |||
Instructions: By default, a checkmark (and hyperlink) is placed in the table for each criteria met. If the documentation at the link destination is an excellent example, add a + to the checkmark in table. If it's poor or incomplete documentation, add a - to the checkmark. | Instructions: By default, a checkmark (and hyperlink) is placed in the table for each criteria met. If the documentation at the link destination is an excellent example, add a + to the checkmark in table. If it's poor or incomplete documentation, add a - to the checkmark. | ||
Revision as of 14:29, 16 June 2010
Activity table
Activity | Pedagogy | Fedora repo | ASLO * | Pootle | Usage page | Development page | Tickets | Smoke test | Journal | Collaboration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fructose | ||||||||||
browse | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
calculate | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
chat | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
etoys | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
imageviewer | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
jukebox | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
log | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | x |
pippy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
read | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
terminal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
turtleeblocks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
write | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ |
Honey | ||||||||||
physics | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | x |
visual match | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ |
abacus | ✓ | In review | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | x |
sliderule | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | x | ✓ | x |
ruler | ✓ | x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | x | ✓ | x | ✓ | x |
Uncategorized | ||||||||||
memorize | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
maze | ? | ✓ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
* Note that to be included on ASLO, an activity must have a license as described here.
Activities to add to the table
- more activities to evaluate: xoirc, moon, labyrinth, typing turtle, tamtam suite, speak, measure, turtleart, implode, scratch, slider, jigsaw, flipsticks, phototoon, record, infoslicer, ...
Ideas for revision
Have a criteria, or want to revise one? This is the section to do it in.
Add your own idea here
IDEA: Color code activities listed based on criteria fulfilled
Rationale: Gives a visual cue for developers that one or more criteria are not complete or accurate.
Test: Activities are listed in RED until each criteria has been addressed and filled in with an active link.
Instructions: Add activity to list. Test each criteria and set status appropriately. When all criteria are fulfilled, color of activity changes to BLACK.
IDEA: Add +/- ranking to criteria in table
Rationale: Add ranking to criteria to encourage better documentation.
Test: Validate if minimum criteria has been met. Subjective assessment follows to determine + or - ranking.
Instructions: By default, a checkmark (and hyperlink) is placed in the table for each criteria met. If the documentation at the link destination is an excellent example, add a + to the checkmark in table. If it's poor or incomplete documentation, add a - to the checkmark.
Be sure to describe:
Rationale: Where does this requirement come from and why is it important?
Test: how we can make sure that the requirement is met - what sort of testing needs to be done to verify this?
Instructions: links to instructions on how Activity authors and maintainers can fulfill the requirement, if possible.