10,579
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 30:
Line 30: +
no edit summary
'''DRAFT of new Licensing text as per the discussion at the 9 June 2011 SLOBs meeting'''
'''DRAFT of new Licensing text as per the discussion at the 9 June 2011 SLOBs meeting'''
Sugar Labs adheres to the principles of Free Software. An [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html overview of these principles] is found on the [http://gnu.org FSF.org website]. The OSD has a [http://opensource.org/docs/osd set of guidelines for Free and Open Source software] that characterize the intentions of our community.
Sugar Labs adheres to the principles of Free Software. An [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html overview of these principles] is provided by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The Open Source Initiative (OSI) has a [http://opensource.org/docs/osd set of guidelines for Free and Open Source software] that characterize the intentions of our community.
All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.
All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.
:Nitpicking is right... but I made the change :) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:51, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:Nitpicking is right... but I made the change :) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:51, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:: That's better, though I'd remove that link altogether. It adds nothing to the official Sugar Labs Licensing page. My suggestion was "is provided by the FSF", with no embedded link at all. [[User:Bert|Bert]] 11:11, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:: That's better, though I'd remove that link altogether. It adds nothing to the official Sugar Labs Licensing page. My suggestion was "is provided by the FSF", with no embedded link at all. [[User:Bert|Bert]] 11:11, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:::Sure... less is more. But I decided to spell out our acronyms when first used (and OSD->OSI) :P --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 11:19, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
----
----
+1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
+1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)