Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing: Difference between revisions
Appearance
mNo edit summary |
categorize |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:Policy]]</noinclude> | |||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
In according to the Sugar Labs [[Licensing|Licensing policy]], the list of licences that are allowed on [[Activity Library]]: | |||
* [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses Software] | * [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses Software] | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
* [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses_4 Fonts] | * [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses_4 Fonts] | ||
{{ | {{Note/warning|Be careful|Make sure that the {{Code|licence}} key in the {{Code|activity.info}} file contains as its value the same short name of the licence as shown in the aforementioned lists. Multiple licences are allowed and need to be separated by a semicolon symbol.}} | ||
If your activity is covered by another one, please [[Service/activities#Administrative_contact|let us know]]. | If your activity is covered by another one, please [[Service/activities#Administrative_contact|let us know]]. |
Latest revision as of 11:14, 1 November 2011
![]() |
NOTICE: This page is a draft in active flux... Please contribute to these contents and discuss issues on the discussion page. |
In according to the Sugar Labs Licensing policy, the list of licences that are allowed on Activity Library:
If your activity is covered by another one, please let us know.