Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sugar Network/Concept"
(Created page with "=== Network Zoom level only for Projects === Network Zoom levels only for projects might be, eg, not trivial to have Zoom levels for any kinds of resources, eg, every wiki page ...") |
(→Rates) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Should rating system be complex, (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) or simple just "Like". | Should rating system be complex, (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) or simple just "Like". | ||
: Just "Like" (though, I guess, it should be named somehow different, maybe "Sweet!") sounds more appropriate solution for the Sugar Network, it is simple and still useful. --[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 17:05, 13 December 2011 (EST) | : Just "Like" (though, I guess, it should be named somehow different, maybe "Sweet!") sounds more appropriate solution for the Sugar Network, it is simple and still useful. --[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 17:05, 13 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | How to calculate Player's reputation? | ||
| + | : Counting the total amount of any contribution doesn't make much sense, e.g., people can spam in comments or a person who Release a Project version can't get the full benefit of this process (there are people who took part in preparing this release). Might be useful to count reputation only for contribution that was rated by people. --[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 17:25, 13 December 2011 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 13 December 2011
Network Zoom level only for Projects
Network Zoom levels only for projects might be, eg, not trivial to have Zoom levels for any kinds of resources, eg, every wiki page or every Gallery object at the same time, having levels only Projects might simplify the usage workflow as well.
Project management
A special workflow for Objectives resources, especially for doers. It shouldn't be as simple as possible since only Project developers see it.
For that case, Project can have several owners, maybe would be better to rename all these Players to Project Team, but in this case it is exactly about close group of Players who know each other well and work well on Project internals.
Project's Objectives have two faces, one simple for users and one for Project developers.
Rates
Should rating system be complex, (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) or simple just "Like".
- Just "Like" (though, I guess, it should be named somehow different, maybe "Sweet!") sounds more appropriate solution for the Sugar Network, it is simple and still useful. --alsroot 17:05, 13 December 2011 (EST)
How to calculate Player's reputation?
- Counting the total amount of any contribution doesn't make much sense, e.g., people can spam in comments or a person who Release a Project version can't get the full benefit of this process (there are people who took part in preparing this release). Might be useful to count reputation only for contribution that was rated by people. --alsroot 17:25, 13 December 2011 (EST)