Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supported systems"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Updated Menu Item? ==
 +
 +
Can you update '''Getting Sugar''' to read '''Getting & Updating Sugar''' ?
 +
 
== Tested? ==
 
== Tested? ==
  

Revision as of 11:41, 14 July 2008

Updated Menu Item?

Can you update Getting Sugar to read Getting & Updating Sugar ?

Tested?

What do these tables represent? Distros on which Sugar is bundled? Distros on which Sugar *can* run, with the necessary dependencies? --Morgs 08:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The former, at least in the case of Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora. But maybe we need to add another column to the table. --Walter 11:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at this time the table should only contain Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora. The other distributions/OS are not supported in any way. -- Marcopg
We better try to define supported. --Walter 02:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at very minimum supported should involve availability of binary packages. Only Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora meet that requirement. -- Marcopg
I've reorganized the table to try to reflect this distinction. --Walter 11:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)