Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supported systems"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
==Updating Sugar to the Latest Version==
 
==Updating Sugar to the Latest Version==
  
What is the recommended process for updating non-OLPC systems, such as Sugar on Ubuntu?
+
What is the recommended process for updating non-OLPC systems, such as Sugar on Ubuntu? Presumably, [[DevelopmentTeam/jhbuild]]?

Revision as of 17:12, 16 July 2008

Updated Menu Item?

Can you update Getting Sugar to read Getting & Updating Sugar ?

Tested?

What do these tables represent? Distros on which Sugar is bundled? Distros on which Sugar *can* run, with the necessary dependencies? --Morgs 08:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The former, at least in the case of Debian, Ubuntu, and Fedora. But maybe we need to add another column to the table. --Walter 11:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at this time the table should only contain Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora. The other distributions/OS are not supported in any way. -- Marcopg
We better try to define supported. --Walter 02:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
I think at very minimum supported should involve availability of binary packages. Only Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora meet that requirement. -- Marcopg
I've reorganized the table to try to reflect this distinction. --Walter 11:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Updating Sugar to the Latest Version

What is the recommended process for updating non-OLPC systems, such as Sugar on Ubuntu? Presumably, DevelopmentTeam/jhbuild?