Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interactive Worksheets"
(New page: How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.)) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's | + | How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see - Sage is not really a child-friendly experience. It would be good to get some of that power, but it's such a massive collection of functionality, I imagine a lot of it wouldn't be needed. I think the best idea could be to keep the code to the developers, and having a reader mode, so the student experience is that of a rendered page. I'll try and think about all this and polish up the proposal before the deadline. [[User:Mabbikeel|mabbikeel]] 22:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 2 April 2009
How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) Homunq 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. mabbikeel 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. Homunq 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I see - Sage is not really a child-friendly experience. It would be good to get some of that power, but it's such a massive collection of functionality, I imagine a lot of it wouldn't be needed. I think the best idea could be to keep the code to the developers, and having a reader mode, so the student experience is that of a rendered page. I'll try and think about all this and polish up the proposal before the deadline. mabbikeel 22:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)