Talk:Features/Server Objects Sharing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* by "general purpose server" I meant that XS is not AMO(for example), I see that Moodle could be utilized to meet [[Features/Server_Objects_Sharing#Detailed_Description]]; imho since Moodle was created to satisfy more general needs, it doesn't fit well to [[Features/Server_Objects_Sharing#Detailed_Description]] in comparing with AMO or [http://scratch.mit.edu/] otherwise why we decided to use AMO instead of XS for ASLO(in my mind we need something similar to ASLO but for objects instead of activities). | * by "general purpose server" I meant that XS is not AMO(for example), I see that Moodle could be utilized to meet [[Features/Server_Objects_Sharing#Detailed_Description]]; imho since Moodle was created to satisfy more general needs, it doesn't fit well to [[Features/Server_Objects_Sharing#Detailed_Description]] in comparing with AMO or [http://scratch.mit.edu/] otherwise why we decided to use AMO instead of XS for ASLO(in my mind we need something similar to ASLO but for objects instead of activities). | ||
I think that Moodle might have a lead in this aspect because it is more easily available on the XS images. Installing ASLO/AMO is quite a bit complicated but the XS comes with a ready-to-run Moodle instance, AFAIK. [[User:Tomeu|Tomeu]] 16:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
* in common case, yes(e.g. in case of local storage for class/school/region) but this particular proposal is about central place like ASLO for activities(at least it was); we already(in SL) have several not trivial to support services(wiki, track, ASLO etc.), so adding library.sl.o won't be a huge problem; imho from usability pov, I don't see any differences between wiki and moodle - they lose a game to special services like AMO and [http://scratch.mit.edu/] when user needs only place to browse/download/upload objects. [[User:Alsroot|Alsroot]] 00:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Ok, I don't think the server side software it's important from the Sugar POV. We just need to make sure that we can correctly upload and download journal entries. So I'm fine with this feature as it is now. Thanks! [[User:Tomeu|Tomeu]] 13:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||