Trademark case studies: Difference between revisions
Joe Raftery (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==== What should the policy be? ==== | ==== What should the policy be? ==== | ||
Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including | Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including clauses related to : | ||
* expiry date | * expiry date | ||
* renewal | * renewal | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
* revocation if you break the terms | * revocation if you break the terms | ||
* anything else? | * anything else? | ||
A copy of the standard contract to be available from our trademark page | |||
(Sean) No bot. As stated previously there needs to be contact, review, and approval for a term period. | |||
=== Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff === | === Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff === | ||
| Line 154: | Line 158: | ||
examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu | examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu | ||
(Sean) that's "Sugar Labs", not "SugarLabs" ;-) | |||
A perfect candidate for the labeling program. | |||
If there's an idea to do advertising, let's talk - very few FOSS projects do any advertising, promotion, or end-user marketing. | |||
==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ==== | ==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ==== | ||
(Sean) Sure - we wish to encourage precisely this case. | |||
==== What should the policy be? ==== | ==== What should the policy be? ==== | ||
(Sean) The labeling program is designed to promote Sugar in a way easily recognizable by teachers, parents, education buyers, etc. | |||
=== Case Name Here=== | === Case Name Here=== | ||