Trademark case studies: Difference between revisions

SeanDaly (talk | contribs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:
==== What should the policy be? ====
==== What should the policy be? ====


Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including clasuses related to :
Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including clauses related to :
* expiry date
* expiry date
* renewal  
* renewal  
Line 39: Line 39:
* revocation if you break the terms
* revocation if you break the terms
* anything else?
* anything else?
A copy of the standard contract to be available from our trademark page
(Sean) No bot. As stated previously there needs to be contact, review, and approval for a term period.


=== Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff ===
=== Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff ===
Line 154: Line 158:


examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu  
examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu  
(Sean) that's "Sugar Labs", not "SugarLabs" ;-)
A perfect candidate for the labeling program.
If there's an idea to do advertising, let's talk - very few FOSS projects do any advertising, promotion, or end-user marketing.


==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ====
==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ====


Stuff goes here.
(Sean) Sure - we wish to encourage precisely this case.


==== What should the policy be? ====
==== What should the policy be? ====


More stuff goes here.
(Sean) The labeling program is designed to promote Sugar in a way easily recognizable by teachers, parents, education buyers, etc.


=== Case Name Here===
=== Case Name Here===