Difference between revisions of "Decision panels/SOAS"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 30: Line 30:
 
[[category:decision panels]]
 
[[category:decision panels]]
  
−
==Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ==
+
====Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ===
  
 
==Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ==
 
==Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ==

Revision as of 03:49, 30 September 2009

A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a September, 2009 Oversight Board decision.

Mandate

Template:Quote

Members

  • Sebastian Dziallas
  • Luke Faraone
  • Martin Dengler
  • Bill Bogstad
  • Faisal Khan
  • Benjamin M. Schwartz
  • Samuel Klein
  • Sean Daly
  • Tabitha Roder
  • Caryl Bigenho
  • Daniel Drake
  • Abhishek Indoria


Process

The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.

=Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?

Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?

Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?

Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?

Retrieved from "https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&oldid=38539"