Requesting a SLOBs decision: Difference between revisions
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
=== Kinds of decisions SLOBs should explicitly not make === | === Kinds of decisions SLOBs should explicitly not make === | ||
# NOT: sending out press releases (Marketing team) | |||
# NOT: can I start this project (just do it) | |||
# NOT: can I join the project (just do it) | |||
# NOT: can I give a talk/presentation about Sugar Labs at $occasion (just do it, but please share your stuff so others can remix it) | |||
# NOT: can I add this feature to the code / what's going to be in the next release (Development team) | |||
# NOT: design issues (Design team) | |||
# NOT: can we install $foobar for our ticket tracker / wiki / etc? (Infrastructure team) | |||
# NOT: first-level conflict resolution (only when public dialogue on mailing lists has failed should there be an appeal for ombudsperson/SLOBs to step in for a specific decision related to one of the decision-types we /can/ make) | |||
# NOT: can I start this deployment (just do it) | |||
# NOT: "I'm a member of the Sugar Labs project" or "in partnership with $name, a volunteer at Sugar Labs"(so individuals can make statements on behalf of themselves and their organizations, but not on behalf of SL) | |||
# your ideas here | |||
=== How a SLOBs decision is requested=== | === How a SLOBs decision is requested=== | ||