Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical: Difference between revisions

Line 4: Line 4:


* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for
* inappropriate licence
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
** code should be covered by one of [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses FSF GPL compatible list]
** code should conform [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses FSF GPL compatible list]
** the rest of content should one of [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ CC] licences
** the rest of content should one of [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ CC] licences
* (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros
* (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros