Platform Team/Package Management System/Getting started: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 == Target Audience ==
-What sort of presentation to use? As a "can opener" can I identify three people in my target audience?
+What sort of presentation to use?
-:Not yet ... (Tom might be a GCompris user / learner-contributor?)
-: Shall we expect visitors from this community? http://www.raspberrypi.org/. They will be interested to see if Sugar will cross-compile to ARM. (I think)
-'''Features''' will be the same for all three audience members. Just to record my first impressions, these three links got me up to speed....http://0install.net/why.html ... http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/gnome-packagekit ... [[Platform_Team/Guide]].
-'''Advantages''' - What are the advantages for Tom Dick and Harry? Are we talking educational or productive?
+'''Features''' Just to record my first impressions, these three links got me up to speed....http://0install.net/why.html ... http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/gnome-packagekit ... [[Platform Team/Guide]]. Followed by {{code | sweets --help}} and {{code | man 0install}}
-'''Benefits''' - Are the benefits different for each? Does Sweets open different doors for each?
+'''Advantages''' - What are the advantages? Are we talking educational or productive?
---[[User:Inkyfingers|Inkyfingers]] 03:13, 4 December 2011 (EST)
-::I find [[Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution |Sweets Distribution]] easier to use for Ubuntu' and its Derivatives (Adding an additional Repository to synaptic) as the packages are pre-configured, ready to use.
+'''Benefits''' - What are the benefits?
+:I find [[Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution |Sweets Distribution]] easier to use for Ubuntu' and its Derivatives (Adding an additional Repository to synaptic) as the packages are pre-configured, ready to use.
 ::[[Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets|Sugar via Sweets]] has a wider applicability to linux OS's but requires a more experienced user. [[User:Satellit|satellit_]] 7:17 4 December 2011 (PST)
 ::: " For now, sweets knows only enough about the glucose dependencies to install them from native packages in Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva, openSUSE, and Gentoo."
@@ Line 46: / Line 44: @@
 * make Sugar Shell launch as simply and obviously as possible for early adopters,
 * add new entrance for non-doers, the way to run activities via Sweets (big task that requires special treatment).
+:Perhaps the new web page could help to point the 'way in'. --[[User:Inkyfingers|Inkyfingers]] 18:08, 9 January 2012 (EST)
 == Explore further documentation ==
 Based on my limited experience of installing sweets on only two distros, Mint-12 and Debian, testing, Wheezy I have two possible suggestions for improved documentation.