Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:  
How [[Activity Team/Zero Sugar|Zero Sugar]] could be useful on examples.
 
How [[Activity Team/Zero Sugar|Zero Sugar]] could be useful on examples.
   −
== What activity instance to prefer, natively packaged or directly from developer? ==
+
== Natively packaged or directly from developer activities? ==
    
Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:
 
Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:
Line 12: Line 12:  
* developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS
 
* developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS
 
* distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users
 
* distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users
* on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances, user by setting policy can prefer only packaged versions
+
* on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances
 +
* user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions
 +
* user all time can pick up recent version from developer

Navigation menu