79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: − − The following two documents contain 1) a report on the value of writing to learn and 2) a petition for Journal revision to be signed by teachers. Line 68:
Line 66: − + + + +
→Sugar / Literacy connection - Journaling / Diary activity and Writing to Learn
== Sugar / Literacy connection - Journaling / Diary activity and Writing to Learn ==
== Sugar / Literacy connection - Journaling / Diary activity and Writing to Learn ==
This group was instructed to:
This group was instructed to:
• Investigate ways that we might take already existing sugar activities and encourage more literacy activities-based on our discussion with Walter Bender (This might include revamping the journal, writing lesson plans for teachers, etc.)
• Investigate ways that we might take already existing sugar activities and encourage more literacy activities-based on our discussion with Walter Bender (This might include revamping the journal, writing lesson plans for teachers, etc.)
• Think of how we might encourage developers to implement peer review/reflection aspects into the Journal activity by conveying 1) their importance and 2) teacher demand
• Think of how we might encourage developers to implement peer review/reflection into the Journal activity by conveying 1) their importance and 2) teacher demand for these capabilities
• Root all suggestions in current best practices for literacy education and be supported with research
• Root all suggestions in current best practices for literacy education and be supported with research
The following two documents contain 1) a report on the value of writing to learn and 2) a petition for Journal revision to be signed by teachers.
[[File:Journal Revision Report.pdf]]
[[File:Journal Revision Report.pdf]]