Difference between revisions of "Decision panels/SOAS"
m |
(→Process: discussion to happen on soas@) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Process == | == Process == | ||
| − | |||
| + | Discussion will take place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SOAS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text "[DP]". | ||
== Talk summaries == | == Talk summaries == | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 30 September 2009
A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a September, 2009 Oversight Board decision.
Mandate
Members
- Sebastian Dziallas
- Luke Faraone
- Martin Dengler
- Bill Bogstad
- Faisal Khan
- Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Samuel Klein
- Sean Daly
- Tabitha Roder
- Caryl Bigenho
- Daniel Drake
- Abhishek Indoria
Process
Discussion will take place on the SOAS mailing list with subject lines beginning with the text "[DP]".
Talk summaries
Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?
Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?
Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?
Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?
Potential naming conventions:
- Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>