Oversight Board/Meeting Log Addendum-2011-12-02

Post meeting discussion

walterbender: bkuhn, keynote2k: please let me know how I can help further re the TM issue

Icarito-d234: if it will make it clearer, we're trying to avoid to replicate the governance and oversight structures locally

walterbender: or if you need more info from SL

walterbender: Icarito-d234: but the governance and oversight you need for your contract are vastly different than the structure at the SFC

Icarito-d234: walterbender: we don't need these for the contract!

Icarito-d234: walterbender: we need them because they are useful

Icarito-d234: it's useful to have oversight

Icarito-d234: a process

kaametza: walterbender: congrats for getting re-elected1

walterbender: kaametza: thanks...

|<--: jt4sugar has left freenode (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)

|<--: raffael has left freenode ()

walterbender: Icarito-d234: but SFC is seemingly not in the position to provide that oversight

Icarito-d234: oversight is the role of SLOBs

Icarito-d234: SFC would provide fiscal sponsorship

Icarito-d234: we would like to operate as Sugar Labs

Icarito-d234: a Sugar Labs team

walterbender: Icarito-d234: we are going around in circles... you just said: we don't need these for the contract!

Icarito-d234: this way we don't have to worry about locally replicating governance

Icarito-d234: yes its not a contract requirement to work directly with Sugar Labs

kaametza: walter, we need to provide income to the communiy

walterbender: Icarito-d234: you are a group of individuals who want to do a contract... or so I understand

Icarito-d234: walterbender: of sugar labs members

kaametza: how we do it, is the main challenge

cjl: kaametza: Income is a tricky issue for a non-profit.

walterbender: kaametza: how does the SFC help you with that goal?

kaametza: cjl: it's not tricky at all

walterbender: kaametza: it seems to me SFC hinders you

walterbender: because it is constained

walterbender: ^constrained

kaametza: as a non profit you can provide sevices

Icarito-d234: we're willing to abide by the constraints to avoid having to replicate structures which is more overhead

walterbender: kaametza: that is not the issue. it is the oversight question and one of logisitcs: they (SFC) has no presence outside of the US, so they cannot not move quickly for these types of issues

kaametza: walter, I understand the SFC agreement is supposed to enable SL to get in contractual relationships

walterbender: kaametza: I think Tony was pretty clear on that topic

walterbender: kaametza, Icarito-d234 but you are still not answering the question... what services and why?

-->|: jt4sugar (~jtsugar@d192-24-234-153.try.wideopenwest.com) has joined #sugar-meeting

kaametza: we'll have to read again

Icarito-d234: walterbender: we're working on documentation too: *Mission*

Icarito-d234: To measure and improve the user experience of learners from Puno-Region by localizing, distributing and supporting software based on their needs and conditions.

walterbender: kaametza: the SFC and hence SL has a very narrow formal agenda... SL community members have many diverse agendas

Icarito-d234: *Main Objective*

Icarito-d234: Field Testing + User Support + Product Development

Icarito-d234: all of these processes feed into each other

Icarito-d234: walterbender: as long as our agendas align in SFC and SL missions, it would be fine, as I understand it

-->|: CanoeBerry (~CanoeBerr@190.196.202.215) has joined #sugar-meeting

Icarito-d234: *align with

walterbender: Icarito-d234: you are mixing apples and oranges.

kaametza: I personally believe SL should include sustainability in the agenda

walterbender: there is the TM issue, for which the jury is still out, and there is the contract issue

Icarito-d234: it is true its not volunteers who work on sugar

Icarito-d234: not really

cjl: Icarito-d234: Can you explain that?

Icarito-d234: walterbender: we've read the TM policy and that's fine for us too

Icarito-d234: cjl: sugar environment is developed by professional developers under contract for third parties

kaametza: we will support Sugar learners in the Puno region

walterbender: Icarito-d234: but those developers are not SL employees

kaametza: we will get paid

kaametza:

cjl: But that work is donated t oSugar Labs on a voluntary basis

Icarito-d234: walterbender: exactly but characterizing them as volunteers is not accurate either

walterbender: Icarito-d234: you are putting words in my mouth

kaametza: so we just needto figure out the securest way

Icarito-d234: so it is in the best interest of Sugar Labs to have people working and earning their living by developing, supporting and extending sugar

cjl: Icarito-d234: No one is disputing that

Icarito-d234: i'm just stressing kaametza's point that SL should be concerned about sustainability

walterbender: Icarito-d234: sure... but it is not at all clear that SFC as a contract agent is the answer

Icarito-d234: walterbender: so we're open to other options

walterbender: Icarito-d234: as Bradley pointed out, the typical model is for individuals and third-parties to do contract work

walterbender: which everyone supports as a model

cjl: But note that (for example) Activity Central is an independent organization that takes on it's own legal liabilities.

walterbender: so the community members can sustain themselves

walterbender: so is OLPCA

Icarito-d234: we believe it would be in the best interest of SL to be involved in the deployment process

walterbender: and so are other organizations that contribute to SL: ceibal, paraguay educa...

walterbender: Icarito-d234: we are involved in deployments all over the world

walterbender: but through 3rd party contracts

Icarito-d234: walterbender: none of these organizations have SL's interests and transparency policies

Icarito-d234: and this is hindering the user's experience with Sugar

walterbender: perhaps

walterbender: so why not set up a model of how to do it correctly?

Icarito-d234: at least from a R&D point of view, SL should be involved in deployments

walterbender: Icarito-d234: you keep implying that we are not...

Icarito-d234: walterbender: SL is a model to do it correctly

Icarito-d234: why replicate efforts?

walterbender: Icarito-d234: but that model has constraints due to the relationship with the SFC

cjl: Icarito-d234: SL has limitations on what it can and cannot do that third parties do not have.

Icarito-d234: walterbender: so let's work with those constraints which are under negotiation

walterbender: Icarito-d234: if, for example, you want SL oversight, then invite SL members to be on your board

walterbender: but it seems like an uphill battle to avoid "replicating efforts"

kaametza: we ensamble a team that is already working

walterbender: kaametza: great

kaametza: yes i know

kaametza: we also have a customer

kaametza: great too, right?

walterbender: kaametza: you "know" what?

Icarito-d234: walterbender: we don't have a board and would like to avoid having to have one

kaametza: that it's great

kaametza: :o)

kaametza: we'll procure sustainablity for the team

walterbender: Icarito-d234: I think you need to come up with the list of what you *do* want and what you *don't* want so we can discuss it with the SFC

kaametza: sorry, sebastian had to take care of mariana [our baby]

kaametza: we'll be back in a sec

bkuhn: Ok, I went idle for a while there. I read the backlog up until now. I don't have much to add that walterbender and cjl haven't already said, and I need to move on to other action items for other Conservancy projects for the rest of the day. So I'm going to /part now.

<--|: bkuhn has left #sugar-meeting ("off to other things")

cjl: Does EscueLab Puno have a formal status, are they a company, are they a Peruvian established NGO (within applicable local law)?

kaametza: cjl: they are getting soon

keynote2k: I'm also going to take off. walterbender: we'll reach out to local labs to learn about how they're structured.

keynote2k: Have a great weekend all.

<--|: keynote2k has left #sugar-meeting

kaametza: keynote2k; thanks, you too

walterbender: ciao tony

kaametza: thank y

cjl: kaametza: Part of what I am trying to understand is that if EscueLab Puno is being created, why does there need to be another contract involved. Why can't the individual Sugar Labs members participate in EscueLab Puno bringing their expertise wit hSugar?

satellit_: note that I am an unpaid volunteer for sugarlabs. Retired and glad to help....

walterbender: satellit_: we are all unpaid volunteers for Sugar Labsand glad you are among our numbers

walterbender: needs to leave soon...

satellit_: : ) we do exist

kaametza: cjl: it can be done directly, we're just trying to stablish a model for teams sustainability

walterbender: Icarito-d234, kaametza: can you please take a stab at my to do ^^?

kaametza: Sugar Labs Teams I mean

walterbender: and we can discuss it next time?

walterbender: kaametza: I appreciate the concern for sustainability, but I am not sure you are attacking the right place in the problem space.

kaametza: sorr walter, don't understand " take

kaametza: a stab a my to do

kaametza: "

walterbender: kaametza: please come up with the list of what you *do* want and what you *don't* want so we can discuss it with the SFC

kaametza: I sent an email yesterday to SLOB's

cjl: kaametza: I think that part of the challenge that OLPC has faced was an attempt to maintain centrality. I think that sustainability for deployments necessarily involves independent operations tha appropriate Sugar and OLCP for their own goals.

walterbender: kaametza: it is not clear to me the advantage of sustaining a Sugar Labs team vs the individuals on the team

walterbender: kaametza: we talked ad nausium about your question and have questions for you

kaametza: cjl: that's why theescuelab puno figure is been formed

kaametza: cjl: still, there is a need for legal representation to the providor of the software support

kaametza: in this case the "Puno Pilot Deployment Team"

kaametza: a Sugar Lbs Team

kaametza: so, regional gobenement contracts wih escuelab puno a set of services

kaametza: then escuelab puno contrats technical support with Sugar Labs

Icarito-d234: yes escuelab puno will deal with more than just software support

kaametza: it's very organic

Icarito-d234: they will provide training for instance

|<--: CanoeBerry has left freenode (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)

-->|: CanoeBerry (~CanoeBerr@190.196.202.215) has joined #sugar-meeting

cjl: kaametza: It is perfectly fine for a group of Sugar Labs members together in free association to collaborate, it is another matter for them to enter contractual obligations on behalf of SL.

cjl: It if fine for them to gather for commercial purposes as well, but not under the "Sugar Labs" banner.

kaametza: cjl: why not/

kaametza: ?

walterbender: kaametza: for the reasons that bradley and tony said in the meeting

cjl: In spite of your contention that income is easy for non-profits, it is not. This is one of the reasons tha OLPC cannot get into the business of sellign individual units.

cjl: Providing services under contract is a "commercial activity" under applicable US law. Non-profits have to tread very carefully with commercial activity and hopw an dwhere the money flows.

kaametza: cjl: it's a diferent problem, I'm talkng about the accountablity of "professional services"

Icarito-d234: yes that is what the mission is about, not for profit

kaametza: it's doable

|<--: CanoeBerry has left freenode (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)

Icarito-d234: the service is in the public good

-->|: CanoeBerry (~CanoeBerr@190.196.202.215) has joined #sugar-meeting

kaametza: since it is in line with the main reason for the non-profit: free software distribution

cjl: kaametza: If you wanted to do it for free, it would be no problem, but you want to get paid to do it. This brings in other considerations about permissable activities for 501(c)3 entities under US tax code.

kaametza: I have read the documentation

walterbender: kaametza, Icarito-d234 : I think we need to let Tony answer these questions... it is ultimately about how the SFC interprets the law...

cjl: Yes I can say that the work doene benefits the community and the mission, but if the money flows t oan individual, that is a commercial activity.

kaametza: and in my unerstanding it is doable, still I made the public questions to slob's so thy could adress them to the SFC

cjl: kaametza: I think walter is saying that they are not quite specific enough. Lawyers do not answer "general questions".

walterbender: kaametza, Icarito-d234: so again, I suggest that you please come up with the list of what you *do* want and what you *don't* want so we can discuss it with the SFC

kaametza: cjl: we are trying to stablish a procedure to get a sustainability model for active sugar members

cjl: lawters need to see very detailed information, in an ideal world, a draft of a contract, or at least an outline of the entitiesd involved, their legal statuses and the proposed arrangements.

walterbender: kaametza: yes. so you have said... but the details are missing

cjl: kaametza: You keep on wsaying that and that is a good thing, but the devil is in the details

cjl: sustainability is not a magic wand you can wave t omake legal issues go away because you mean well. The structures and arrangements must be detailed enouigh for a lawyer to offer suggested changes in the language.

kaametza: walterbender: we needed the answers to the questions presented in order to evaluate how do we need to documentate the details

walterbender: kaametza: you got an answer: no.

cjl: Services contracts are (in general) painful. I have entered into many on behalf of my employers in the past and they are routinely quite a hassle to get past lawyers/contracting agents.

kaametza: procedures and documentation

walterbender: kaametza: but you also got an opening: if you can be concrete about a specific request

walterbender: needs to go. back later