Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  22:17, 21 May 2009
Line 211: Line 211:  
* core(glucose), six months(or so) release cycle, w/o any activities only dbus API
 
* core(glucose), six months(or so) release cycle, w/o any activities only dbus API
 
* bridge([[Development_Team/sugar-port|sugar-port]] for example) between all(in ideal) already deployed sugars and activities i.e. it provides backwards compatibility(so the same activity code will work on all sugars) and at the same time provides features from newest sugar(so the same activity code will use last sugar's features)
 
* bridge([[Development_Team/sugar-port|sugar-port]] for example) between all(in ideal) already deployed sugars and activities i.e. it provides backwards compatibility(so the same activity code will work on all sugars) and at the same time provides features from newest sugar(so the same activity code will use last sugar's features)
* the rest of sugar world i.e. fructose/honey (but now there is no differences between them) that use core(by dbus) directly, if all deployed sugars have the same API for desired functionality(for example in case of preselected mime type, ObjectsChooser has different API for 0.82-0.86), or use bridge otherwise.  
+
* the rest of sugar world i.e. fructose/honey (but now there is no differences between them) that use core(by dbus) directly, if all deployed sugars have the same API for desired functionality(for example in case of preselected mime type, ObjectsChooser has different API for 0.82-0.86), or use bridge otherwise.<br>imho another point to have activities outside of core release cycle - activities have more shorter release cycle then core has
<br>imho another point to have activities outside of core release cycle - activities have more shorter release cycle then core has
      
And of course deployers can form any sets from these components
 
And of course deployers can form any sets from these components

Navigation menu