5,705
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: +
Development Team/Meetings (view source)
Revision as of 09:33, 25 October 2010
, 09:33, 25 October 2010→Upcoming Agenda
** To accept ''regular'' (reviewer decides are patches regular or not, of course better to discuss it with other committers if there are doubts) patches, only one reviewer is needed [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
** To accept ''regular'' (reviewer decides are patches regular or not, of course better to discuss it with other committers if there are doubts) patches, only one reviewer is needed [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
** Not regular patches should be formed in [[Features]]. These patches might take several tens of K. This is by design that it is hard not only to develop but to review as well and should involve several committers for reasonable amount of time. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:28, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
** Not regular patches should be formed in [[Features]]. These patches might take several tens of K. This is by design that it is hard not only to develop but to review as well and should involve several committers for reasonable amount of time. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:28, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
** Review process should not include debates about coding style, if codding style conform to lint checks (and maybe Hacking Policy but only if it has unequivocal statements, needs to be rechecked), it should be applied [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:33, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
* officially dropping support for 0.86? (e.g. {{bug|1838}})
* officially dropping support for 0.86? (e.g. {{bug|1838}})
** do we need to discuss thing like that on Development Team meeting, is it more appropriate task for Deployment and Platform teams? [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
** do we need to discuss thing like that on Development Team meeting, is it more appropriate task for Deployment and Platform teams? [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:59, 25 October 2010 (EDT)