Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
<noinclude>{{TOCright}}
 
<noinclude>{{TOCright}}
[[Category:Feature Ready for Release Manager]]
+
[[Category:Feature Accepted 0.88]]
[[Category:Feature|<Feature Name>]]
+
[[Category:FeatureObsoleted|TableView Widget]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>
   Line 15: Line 15:  
== Current status ==
 
== Current status ==
 
* Targeted release: 0.88
 
* Targeted release: 0.88
* Last updated: Sat Nov 28 21:15:02 UTC 2009
+
* Last updated: Mon Jan 11 21:15:02 UTC 2010
 
* Percentage of completion: 90%
 
* Percentage of completion: 90%
   Line 24: Line 24:  
=== SmoothTable class ===
 
=== SmoothTable class ===
   −
Model less implementation. The real widget consist of ''visible-columns'' * (''visible-rows'' + 2) identical widgets(constructor is beeing passed to SmoothTable while creation) and while scrolling(by pixel) SmoothTable shifts these widgets.
+
Model less implementation. The real widget consists of ''visible-columns'' * (''visible-rows'' + 2) identical widgets (constructor is passed to SmoothTable during creation) and while scrolling (by pixel); SmoothTable shifts these widgets.
    
=== TableView class ===
 
=== TableView class ===
Line 32: Line 32:  
== Benefit to Sugar ==
 
== Benefit to Sugar ==
   −
Standard gtk components are not designed to be lazy. Third party widgets, I managed to find, uses scheme with renders(like gtk components), introduced component uses widgets instead(could have performance penalties, I guess, in common case but we don't have many rows in Journal view, so should be ok for us).
+
Standard gtk components are not designed to be lazy. Third party widgets, I managed to find, uses scheme with renders (like gtk components), introduced component uses widgets instead (could have performance penalties, I guess, in common case but we don't have many rows in Journal view, so should be ok for us).
    
Benefits we have for such scheme:
 
Benefits we have for such scheme:
* coding cells is more useful by using widgets then renders, we can reuse our existed custom widgets instead of coding sugarized cell renders
+
* coding cells is more useful by using widgets than renders, we can reuse our existing custom widgets instead of coding sugarized cell renders
* in some cases its hard to sugarize cells theme(we still have ugly progress bar for Journal entries), with new widget, we use just gtk.ProgressBar
+
* in some cases it's hard to sugarize cells theme (we still have ugly progress bar for Journal entries), with new widget, we use just gtk.ProgressBar
    
== Scope ==
 
== Scope ==
628

edits

Navigation menu