Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure Team/TODO"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{ GoogleTrans-en | es =show | bg =show | zh-CN =show | zh-TW =show | hr =show | cs =show | da =show | nl =show | fi =show | fr =show | de =show | el =show | hi =show | it =show | ja =show | ko =show | no =show | pl =show | pt =show | ro =show | ru =show | sv =show }}{{TeamHeader|Infrastructure Team}}</noinclude>
 
{{TOCright}}
 
 
=== Active Tasks ===
 
=== Active Tasks ===
 
{| border=1 cellpadding=3 style="border: 1px solid white; border-collapse: collapse; background: #e3e4e5;"
 
{| border=1 cellpadding=3 style="border: 1px solid white; border-collapse: collapse; background: #e3e4e5;"

Revision as of 20:38, 27 August 2009

Active Tasks

Task Owner Priority Next Milestone Notes
install a real ticket system such as RT open

Requested Tasks

Task Owner Priority Next Milestone Notes


Backups

We are considering a couple of possibilities:

  • MIT provides a backup service for a few bucks per machine per month via Tivoli
  • Harvard Computer Society filer

Shell accounts

Setup workload will be distributed between the sysadmins and a few members of the core team.

General

  • CMS to host a few, nice looking, official pages.
  • git for both core and activities. personal repos. (ssh access for devs)
  • Trac for core and activities
  • buildbot, master + a few slaves (ssh access for devs)
  • RT system
    • Is this really needed? We can just use other infrastructure for help requests... Firefoxman 19:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Pootle
  • LDAP or OpenID authentication across various Sugarlabs tools

Completed Tasks

Task Owner Priority Completion Date Notes