10,505
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: − **1. Updates to the TM policy (http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trademark)+ Line 25:
Line 25: − **2. Updates to the Local Lab wiki (http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Local_Labs)+ Line 54:
Line 54: − :"Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy." − + + +
Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2012-05-30 (view source)
Revision as of 19:42, 30 May 2012
, 19:42, 30 May 2012→Local Labs
Specifically:
Specifically:
==== 1. Updates to the TM policy ([[Trademark]]) ====
The SLOBs can elect to allow "Local Labs" to use the "Sugar Labs" mark with or without written permission. Allowing Local Labs to use the mark without permission is easier to administer and gives Sugar/Conservancy greater distance from any potential problems. And, the SLOBs can exercise some discretion in which Local Labs get listed in their directory without explicitly taking on the burden of vetting and supervising every Local Lab.
The SLOBs can elect to allow "Local Labs" to use the "Sugar Labs" mark with or without written permission. Allowing Local Labs to use the mark without permission is easier to administer and gives Sugar/Conservancy greater distance from any potential problems. And, the SLOBs can exercise some discretion in which Local Labs get listed in their directory without explicitly taking on the burden of vetting and supervising every Local Lab.
==== 2. Updates to the Local Lab wiki ([[Local_Labs]]) ====
We should update this wiki entry as well. Tony took a stab at editing; see below:
We should update this wiki entry as well. Tony took a stab at editing; see below:
And, at the bottom of the page:
And, at the bottom of the page:
---
"Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy."
----
A second motion was made by icarito, but not seconded:
A second motion was made by icarito, but not seconded: