10,505
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + +
Talk:Oversight Board/2017-2019-candidates (view source)
Revision as of 09:16, 13 September 2017
, 09:16, 13 September 2017no edit summary
:: Again, the decision was taken by the Membership and Elections Committee and ratified during the SLOB's meeting. We try to keep the Systems list copied on all meetings in case you want to explore how we have taken all decisions about the elections. I guess your criticism is OK but inaccuracy and is not. Meeting complete Reference at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/systems/2017-August/005514.html [[User:Laura Vargas|Laura Vargas]] ([[User talk:Laura Vargas|talk]]) 09:05, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
:: Again, the decision was taken by the Membership and Elections Committee and ratified during the SLOB's meeting. We try to keep the Systems list copied on all meetings in case you want to explore how we have taken all decisions about the elections. I guess your criticism is OK but inaccuracy and is not. Meeting complete Reference at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/systems/2017-August/005514.html [[User:Laura Vargas|Laura Vargas]] ([[User talk:Laura Vargas|talk]]) 09:05, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
:::(0) Thank you for acknowledging that I am entitled to an opinion. (1) I have seen no evidence presented that any decision was taken by the Membership and Elections Committee. I await the link to that discussion. (2) Your reporting the decision to the oversight board is not a ratification. Can you please explain where I am inaccurate? If you go back to my original post, I didn't question the process by which the decision was made -- although now I have my doubts as I see no discussion of the 1500 character limit by the committee, only your proposing it -- but rather, I expressed my opinion of the decision. How is that "inaccurate"? Meanwhile, back to coding. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 09:16, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
I strongly suggest candidates to optimize space given and avoid irrelevant information such as quoting other people's thoughts different from those thoughts of the candidate him/her self. Instead I suggest candidates to focus on a simple message to share your motivation, vision and/or management skills that make you an ideal candidate for the Sugar Labs Oversight Board.
I strongly suggest candidates to optimize space given and avoid irrelevant information such as quoting other people's thoughts different from those thoughts of the candidate him/her self. Instead I suggest candidates to focus on a simple message to share your motivation, vision and/or management skills that make you an ideal candidate for the Sugar Labs Oversight Board.