Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trademark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Section 5a== | ==Section 5a== | ||
| − | It has been suggested that we certify distributions as "Sugar on a Stick". | + | :It has been suggested that we certify distributions as "Sugar on a Stick". "Otherwise nothing stops anyone from creating a lousy version which hardly works and calls it Sugar on a Stick Peanut Butter release, etc." |
| − | "Otherwise nothing stops anyone from creating a lousy version which | ||
| − | hardly works and calls it Sugar on a Stick Peanut Butter release, etc." | ||
| − | Comments? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | + | :Comments? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ::We have our hands full verifying and testing our own release. Our best defense is focusing on making the best release and so being able to market it as such. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:28, 7 July 2009
Sugar Labs association/organization conflated with Sugar software
- 2a & b, and elsewhere suggest that the full name of our product is 'Sugar Labs' rather than Sugar or some form of Sugar. Yes, 5e suggests that Sugar is short for Sugar Labs. This would be a new practice. Why conflate the terms?
- Why not register Sugar as a mark for our software, and Sugar Labs for our association?
- --FGrose 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Section 5a
- It has been suggested that we certify distributions as "Sugar on a Stick". "Otherwise nothing stops anyone from creating a lousy version which hardly works and calls it Sugar on a Stick Peanut Butter release, etc."
- Comments? --Walter 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- We have our hands full verifying and testing our own release. Our best defense is focusing on making the best release and so being able to market it as such. --FGrose 23:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)