8,288
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: − + Line 18:
Line 18: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→How to make modifications: update link
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
==Logo==
==Logo==
: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typface) are pending registration, no? If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typeface) are pending registration, no? If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::We have our hands full verifying and testing our own release. Our best defense is focusing on making the best release and so being able to market it as such. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::We have our hands full verifying and testing our own release. Our best defense is focusing on making the best release and so being able to market it as such. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::I agree. It adds yet another thing to worry about that can better be handled downstream. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 23:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::I agree. It adds yet another thing to worry about that can better be handled downstream. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 23:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
::: This line of judgement needs revisiting. "our own release" means Strawberry? If SL lets anyone use "Sugar on a Stick", then it's probably giving up the rights to the trademark "Sugar on a Stick", right?
==[[Sugar Labs/Legal/Logo and trademark policy]]==
==[[Sugar Labs/Legal/Logo and trademark policy]]==
: This older page needs updating. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 18:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
: This older page needs updating. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 18:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Merge|Sugar Labs/Legal/Logo and trademark_policy}}
{{Merge|Sugar Labs/Legal/Logo and trademark_policy}}
== Sugar on a Stick Guidelines ==
I am herewith proposing the following changes to the section 5a. This has been derived from Fedora's [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/TrademarkGuidelines trademark guidelines] and might need to be adjusted to cover more cases, as listed in those guidelines. By referring to Sugar on a Stick, the following draft means the project [[Sugar_on_a_Stick| located]] and [http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/soas hosted] here.
* You '''may''' use the term ''Sugar on a Stick'' whenever referring to the official Sugar on a Stick product and its releases, as well as when distributing ''unmodified'' copies of it.
** However, this usage '''must not''' imply any endorsement by Sugar Labs or the Sugar on a Stick project, unless this is case and an appropriate agreement has been reached.
* You '''may''' modify Sugar on a Stick and create ''remixes'' of it.
** However, when distributing or selling this modified version, you '''must not''' call it Sugar on a Stick.
** When not exposing the resulting product to the public, you '''may''' still call it Sugar on a Stick, though. A deployment might adjust Sugar on a Stick for its needs and still say it deployed Sugar on a Stick, as long as the modified version is not distributed publicly.
== substantially unmodified ==
We discuss examples of "substantially unmodified" in [[Sugar Labs/Governance/Trademark|Section 2]] of the policy: "including but not limited to: the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, or the inclusion of bug-fix patches." But it would be instructive to give some examples of changes that would not qualify as substantially unmodified: including but not limited to adding of non-free drivers. (We need to build consensus around this issue.) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
== How to make modifications ==
There is a discussion [[Features/SoaS_customization|here]] about making a systemic process for most trivial modifications. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
==Sugar Trademark Policy==
Final text moved to [[Trademark]] during the May 6/7, 2010 SLOBs approval.
= Trademark case studies =
As the next step in working on the trademark, we are preparing case studies. The below text is taken from the [[Trademark case studies]] page - please [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Trademark_case_studies&action=edit edit that page directly] to contribute.
{{:Trademark case studies}}