238
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + +
→Should we approve this use of our trademark?
==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ====
==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ====
Do it like Microsoft - you can only put the '''CONTAINS SUGAR''' decal on the front if the computer meets our minimum specification. If it doesn't meet that specification then you can put '''contains sugar operating system (R)''' in small print in the specification box on the back.
Do it like Microsoft - you can only put the '''CONTAINS SUGAR''' decal on the front if the computer meets our minimum specification. If it doesn't meet that specification then you can put '''contains sugar operating system (R)''' in small print in the specification box on the back.
(Sean) No, neither of these - the company should apply for a license for our label program. We will need to verify that there actually is Sugar running. License should be for one year with updated rider from applicant for renewal. I don't think however we should charge for licensing, including by commercial entities.
==== How should the policy work to achieve this ====
==== How should the policy work to achieve this ====