Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
 
== Some Discussion on SoaS and using it on the XO ==
 
== Some Discussion on SoaS and using it on the XO ==
   −
Can I get SoaS (or "the latest Sugar") on my XO is a FAQ without a clear answer. [[#Original_IRC_Discussion|an IRC discussion on #sugar]] raised the [[#Discussion_Items|following questions for discussion]]:
+
'''Can I get SoaS on my XO''' is a FAQ without a clear answer.
    +
[[#Original_IRC_Discussion|An IRC discussion on #sugar]] raised the [[#Discussion_Items|following questions for discussion]]:
    
== Discussion Items ==
 
== Discussion Items ==
Line 13: Line 15:     
:This section is intentionally not titled "jffs2 images".
 
:This section is intentionally not titled "jffs2 images".
      
=== non-Fedora bits ===
 
=== non-Fedora bits ===
Line 20: Line 21:     
:Though (and this is potentially a big "though") these bits/repos must be supported by SugarLabs without any upstream assistance (this statement is a bit less equivocal than strictly necessary), they would provide a solution with a lot more working features.  For example, it's hard to imagine an accepted XO-1 solution without power management, or an accepted Eee (is that Via???) solution without wireless.  However, these may not be enough of SoaS's target audience to merit the additional work.
 
:Though (and this is potentially a big "though") these bits/repos must be supported by SugarLabs without any upstream assistance (this statement is a bit less equivocal than strictly necessary), they would provide a solution with a lot more working features.  For example, it's hard to imagine an accepted XO-1 solution without power management, or an accepted Eee (is that Via???) solution without wireless.  However, these may not be enough of SoaS's target audience to merit the additional work.
      
=== OLPC-like update mechanism ===
 
=== OLPC-like update mechanism ===
243

edits

Navigation menu