Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==VirtualBox 2.2.0b2 on Vista64 host== | | ==VirtualBox 2.2.0b2 on Vista64 host== |
| + | * Boots from iso image into Sugar |
| + | * Network OK bridged or NAT |
| + | * Terminal prompt: [liveuser@localhost ~]$ |
| + | <br> |
| + | * /dev/dm-1 on /media/Soas2-2009040110 (with 0 MB free) shown as resource in Frame |
| + | |
| + | ==Live USB on XO-1 with q2e32 firmware == |
| + | I used LiveUSB Creator to put this build on 1.90GB USB flash drive with 256 persistent area. |
| + | |
| + | There's a delay of over a minute delay at a blank screen, after the "hot dog" screen shows boot completed. |
| + | |
| + | All the known issues with Fedora builds on XO listed at [[olpc:Rawhide-XO#Known issues]] are still present: I have to hold down the check key, no sound, no power management, many OLPC keyboard keys don't work, etc. |
| + | |
| + | === Browse failures === |
| + | Browse failed to start. The first time the globe icon pulsed, I looked away, and after about 30 seconds the Journal displayed and there was no Browse in the frame or Alt+Tab. The second time the world icon pulsed, I saw the Browse window appear with "File not found", and then the Journal displayed. Both times I saw nothing relevant in ~/.sugar/default/logs or /var/log/messages. The WebAactivity log showed "Received SaveYourself", "Received SaveComplete". I had no network connectivity. |
| + | |
| + | The default home page for Browse is <tt>/usr/share/library-common/index.html</tt> which does not exist (see bug 574 and 645). I created a dummy page here and Browse started fine! |
| + | |
| + | I tried browsing <tt>file:///home/liveuser</tt> and Browse hung, putting up a busy cursor. |
| + | |
| + | I restarted Browse from Terminal using `sugar-launch org.laptopWebActivity` and tried browsing <tt>http://sugarlabs.org</tt>, again with no internet connectivity. That locked Browse, and it eventually died with "Illegal instruction". Since Browse starts at http://sugarlabs.org if /usr/share/library-common/index.html does not exist, this is probably the same lockup as the first. |