1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd react to a weak connection; how many people could join a conversation; whether both sides could talk at once; let alone what you think it would take to accomplish whatever it is you plan. Please look at the other proposals and expand yours to better match the more-complete ones. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 00:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd react to a weak connection; how many people could join a conversation; whether both sides could talk at once; let alone what you think it would take to accomplish whatever it is you plan. Please look at the other proposals and expand yours to better match the more-complete ones. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 00:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The vision of the project is great. Collaboration is the key. I would love to see the project being pursued irrespective of whether it gets selected in GSoC'09. [[User:manusheel|Manu]]