130
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 199:
Line 199: − # Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones. </small> + Line 226:
Line 226: − +
Decision panels/SOAS/Report (view source)
Revision as of 17:46, 29 October 2009
, 17:46, 29 October 2009..
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
| valign="top"| <!-- invalid question -->
| valign="top"| <!-- invalid question -->
| valign="top"| <!-- defer -->
| valign="top"| <!-- defer -->
# Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros; this can be done neutrally. </small>
| valign="top"| <!-- undecided -->
| valign="top"| <!-- undecided -->
Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>use a more specific name</small>
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>use a more specific name</small>
| valign="top"| <!-- invalid question -->
| valign="top"| <!-- invalid question -->
Samuel Klein - <small>Too specific. Avoid being confusing, but SOAS could still refer to a line of 'sticks'.</small>
Samuel Klein - <small>The question is too specific. I agree with both Ben and Sean, who feel they fall on 'Yes' and 'No' sides of the fence.</small>
| valign="top"| <!-- defer -->
| valign="top"| <!-- defer -->
| valign="top"| <!-- undecided -->
| valign="top"| <!-- undecided -->