2,486
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Activity Library/Editors/Policy (view source)
Revision as of 23:03, 29 November 2009
, 23:03, 29 November 2009FOSS
==FOSS==
I support the inclusion of non open source software in ASLO. If it is Sugar compatible and has educational value, why restrict kids access to it. It is an education project first and foremost (though there are other considerations).
I do think the software should be free (zero cost) because the inclusion of commercial software may lead to a conflict of interest or perceived conflict of interrest. Tony
I support the inclusion of non open source software in ASLO. If it is Sugar compatible and has educational value, why restrict kids access to it. It is an education project first and foremost (though there are other considerations).
I do think the software should be free (zero cost) because the inclusion of commercial software may lead to a conflict of interest or perceived conflict of interrest. Tony