Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
9 bytes removed ,  10:15, 30 December 2009
small rewording
Line 6: Line 6:  
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 
==Logo==
 
==Logo==
: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typface) are pending registration, no?  If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
+
: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typeface) are pending registration, no?  If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
 
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 
::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 
::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 
::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 65: Line 65:       −
:If you are producing a new product which is based on Sugar Labs software but which has more substantial changes than those described in the previous paragraph, you may refer to your product as "derived from Sugar Labs," "based on Sugar Labs," or "a derivative of Sugar Labs."
+
:If you are producing a new product which is based on Sugar Labs software but which has more substantial changes than those described in the previous paragraph, you may refer to your product as '''"derived from", "based on", or "a derivative of" a Sugar Labs mark.'''
    
:b.
 
:b.
34

edits

Navigation menu