Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | == Finances ==
| + | In attendance: |
| | | |
− | === Current status === | + | SLOB members: walter, tomeu, seandaly, mchua, canoeberry, cjb |
| + | |
| + | Some community members (including dfarning) attended the meeting. |
| + | |
| + | == Agenda == |
| + | |
| + | # Finances |
| + | # Infrastructure |
| + | # Trademark policy |
| + | # Goals for 2010 |
| + | |
| + | Thanks to [[#Meeting-prep work|meeting-prep work]] done by mchua, we moved quickly through the agenda. |
| + | |
| + | === Finances === |
| + | |
| + | We '''agreed''' to all actively seek out a replacement for our interim FD. |
| + | |
| + | === Infrastructure === |
| + | |
| + | '''Motion:''' Authorize [[User:Lfaraone|Luke Faraone]] to ship some used hardware from the Wikipedia Foundation (12 servers) to various hosting sites. The cost should not exceed US$300. |
| + | |
| + | The motion passed: 6 yea; 1 absent. |
| + | |
| + | '''Motion:''' Authorize Bernie to purchase a new server. The cost should not exceed US$ 3000. |
| + | |
| + | We deferred action on this motion until we have more information (regarding hosting and the utility of the Wikipedia servers). |
| + | |
| + | === Trademark === |
| + | |
| + | We '''agreed''' to write some case-studies/scenarios before finalizing the TM policy (Please refer to [[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Trademark_case_studies|case studies]]). |
| + | |
| + | === Goals for 2010 === |
| + | |
| + | We did not discuss this topic. |
| + | |
| + | == Next meeting == |
| + | |
| + | Friday, 29 January 2010 16:00 UTC ('''Note:''' We will again be meeting one hour later than usual.) |
| + | |
| + | == Log == |
| + | |
| + | [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2010-01-22|Meeting Log]] |
| + | |
| + | [[Category:Oversight board]] |
| + | [[Category:Meetings]] |
| + | [[Category:Meeting minutes]] |
| + | [[Category:Decision panels]] |
| + | |
| + | ==Meeting-prep work== |
| + | |
| + | === Finances === |
| + | |
| + | ==== Current status ==== |
| | | |
| # We have assets of $25507.96 as of the Nov 2009 report from the SFC. | | # We have assets of $25507.96 as of the Nov 2009 report from the SFC. |
Line 10: |
Line 62: |
| # What is our current process for requesting payments: [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions]] | | # What is our current process for requesting payments: [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions]] |
| | | |
− | === Open Q&A === | + | ==== Open Q&A ==== |
| | | |
| Questions about finances? Put them here! | | Questions about finances? Put them here! |
Line 18: |
Line 70: |
| * Another question | | * Another question |
| | | |
− | == Infrastructure == | + | === Infrastructure === |
| | | |
− | === New server === | + | ==== New server ==== |
| | | |
| This is a request to pre-approve the budget for a fast machine with 8 cores | | This is a request to pre-approve the budget for a fast machine with 8 cores |
Line 34: |
Line 86: |
| '''Motion:''' Authorize Bernie to purchase a new server. The cost should not exceed US$ 3000. | | '''Motion:''' Authorize Bernie to purchase a new server. The cost should not exceed US$ 3000. |
| | | |
− | === Wikipedia servers === | + | ==== Wikipedia servers ==== |
| | | |
| As discussed in the latest [http://me.etin.gs/treehouse/treehouse.log.20100119_1559.html InfraTeam meeting], | | As discussed in the latest [http://me.etin.gs/treehouse/treehouse.log.20100119_1559.html InfraTeam meeting], |
Line 53: |
Line 105: |
| (12 servers) to various hosting sites. The cost should not exceed US$300. | | (12 servers) to various hosting sites. The cost should not exceed US$300. |
| | | |
− | == Trademark == | + | === Trademark === |
| | | |
− | === Background === | + | ==== Background ==== |
| | | |
− | ==== Goals and scope ==== | + | ===== Goals and scope ===== |
| | | |
| We are working on completing and ratifying a trademark policy for the Sugar Labs marks, which are held by the SFC on behalf of SL. This policy will have to be approved by the SFLC before it becomes legally binding; once it does, it will affect the following marks when used in a Sugar Labs context: | | We are working on completing and ratifying a trademark policy for the Sugar Labs marks, which are held by the SFC on behalf of SL. This policy will have to be approved by the SFLC before it becomes legally binding; once it does, it will affect the following marks when used in a Sugar Labs context: |
Line 68: |
Line 120: |
| * Sugar | | * Sugar |
| | | |
− | ==== Current status ==== | + | ===== Current status ===== |
| | | |
| We currently have '''no ratified trademark policy.''' We have been using [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark]] as our guide on individual cases in the interim. The current draft of our trademark policy is available at [[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Sugar_Trademark_Policy]]. | | We currently have '''no ratified trademark policy.''' We have been using [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark]] as our guide on individual cases in the interim. The current draft of our trademark policy is available at [[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Sugar_Trademark_Policy]]. |
| | | |
− | ==== Prior decisions ==== | + | ===== Prior decisions ===== |
| | | |
| We have passed several trademark-related decisions in the interim that may be affected by our policy ratification decision. | | We have passed several trademark-related decisions in the interim that may be affected by our policy ratification decision. |
Line 80: |
Line 132: |
| * [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-15#Fedora_use_of_Sugar_Trademark|The upcoming Sugar on a Stick release, which will be a Fedora 13 spin, is approved to use the Sugar on a Stick name.]] | | * [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-15#Fedora_use_of_Sugar_Trademark|The upcoming Sugar on a Stick release, which will be a Fedora 13 spin, is approved to use the Sugar on a Stick name.]] |
| | | |
− | ==== References and resources ==== | + | ===== References and resources ===== |
| | | |
| We have been drawing inspiration from how other open source projects have written their trademark policies. | | We have been drawing inspiration from how other open source projects have written their trademark policies. |
Line 91: |
Line 143: |
| * [http://www.linuxmark.org/faq.php using the "Linux" trademark] | | * [http://www.linuxmark.org/faq.php using the "Linux" trademark] |
| | | |
− | === Discussion points === | + | ==== Discussion points ==== |
| | | |
| * [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-January/009874.html proposed patch to the current draft] | | * [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-January/009874.html proposed patch to the current draft] |
Line 109: |
Line 161: |
| ** Governance setup: The trademark secretary would be an interim appointed position until the next election cycle (fall), at which time if we decide it has been useful and wish to make it a regular appointed position (like ombudsman and treasurer), we can. | | ** Governance setup: The trademark secretary would be an interim appointed position until the next election cycle (fall), at which time if we decide it has been useful and wish to make it a regular appointed position (like ombudsman and treasurer), we can. |
| | | |
− | === Motion === | + | ==== Motion ==== |
| | | |
| To be called when the discussion is over, and there is general consensus that the trademark policy draft is ready: | | To be called when the discussion is over, and there is general consensus that the trademark policy draft is ready: |
Line 117: |
Line 169: |
| MOTION: To appoint NAME as trademark secretary until the next election/appointment cycle, to be responsible for answering queries on trademark policy as set by SLOBs, acting as a guide/coach/advocate to parties requesting trademark usage and assisting them in putting motions on the topic before SLOBs, and maintaining public records so that all can track relevant SLOBs decisions on the matter. | | MOTION: To appoint NAME as trademark secretary until the next election/appointment cycle, to be responsible for answering queries on trademark policy as set by SLOBs, acting as a guide/coach/advocate to parties requesting trademark usage and assisting them in putting motions on the topic before SLOBs, and maintaining public records so that all can track relevant SLOBs decisions on the matter. |
| | | |
− | === Followup === | + | ==== Followup ==== |
| | | |
| The following action items need to be taken by somebody. | | The following action items need to be taken by somebody. |
Line 126: |
Line 178: |
| * #action Perform any necessary follow-up with the parties involved in related [[#Prior decisions]] to ensure past decisions are brought up to date to be compliant with the current (newly ratified) policy. In particular, start SoaS through the trademark approval process. | | * #action Perform any necessary follow-up with the parties involved in related [[#Prior decisions]] to ensure past decisions are brought up to date to be compliant with the current (newly ratified) policy. In particular, start SoaS through the trademark approval process. |
| | | |
− | ==Goals for 2010== | + | === Goals for 2010 === |
| Proposed 2010 goals for Sugar Labs (very rough first pass) | | Proposed 2010 goals for Sugar Labs (very rough first pass) |
| # Release Sucrose 0.88 and 0.90 in order to provide a more useful and stable learning platform for deployments and developers | | # Release Sucrose 0.88 and 0.90 in order to provide a more useful and stable learning platform for deployments and developers |
Line 150: |
Line 202: |
| ## Encourage new people to join our project | | ## Encourage new people to join our project |
| | | |
− | == Future issues to address == | + | === Future issues to address === |
| | | |
| None immediately, as of now - [[Oversight_Board/Minutes]] may provide some inspiration. Please add topics to the list if they come up. | | None immediately, as of now - [[Oversight_Board/Minutes]] may provide some inspiration. Please add topics to the list if they come up. |