Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| ==== What should the policy be? ==== | | ==== What should the policy be? ==== |
| | | |
− | Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including clasuses related to : | + | Approval by a trademark bot since you are using the software unchanged. Approval subject to you confirming you agree to our standard contract including clauses related to : |
| * expiry date | | * expiry date |
| * renewal | | * renewal |
Line 39: |
Line 39: |
| * revocation if you break the terms | | * revocation if you break the terms |
| * anything else? | | * anything else? |
| + | |
| + | A copy of the standard contract to be available from our trademark page |
| + | |
| + | (Sean) No bot. As stated previously there needs to be contact, review, and approval for a term period. |
| | | |
| === Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff === | | === Sugar on a Stick with extra stuff === |
Line 154: |
Line 158: |
| | | |
| examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu | | examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu |
| + | |
| + | (Sean) that's "Sugar Labs", not "SugarLabs" ;-) |
| + | A perfect candidate for the labeling program. |
| + | If there's an idea to do advertising, let's talk - very few FOSS projects do any advertising, promotion, or end-user marketing. |
| | | |
| ==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ==== | | ==== Should we approve this use of our trademark? ==== |
| | | |
− | Stuff goes here.
| + | (Sean) Sure - we wish to encourage precisely this case. |
| | | |
| ==== What should the policy be? ==== | | ==== What should the policy be? ==== |
| | | |
− | More stuff goes here.
| + | (Sean) The labeling program is designed to promote Sugar in a way easily recognizable by teachers, parents, education buyers, etc. |
| | | |
| === Case Name Here=== | | === Case Name Here=== |