10,505
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + Line 28:
Line 28: +
no edit summary
'''DRAFT of new Licensing text as per the discussion at the 9 June 2011 SLOBs meeting'''
'''DRAFT of new Licensing text as per the discussion at the 9 June 2011 SLOBs meeting'''
Sugar Labs adheres to the principles of Free Software. An [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html overview of these principles] is found on the [http://gnu.org GNU.org website]. The OSD has a [http://opensource.org/docs/osd set of guidelines for Free and Open Source software] that characterize the intentions of our community.
Sugar Labs adheres to the principles of Free Software. An [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html overview of these principles] is found on the [http://gnu.org FSF.org website]. The OSD has a [http://opensource.org/docs/osd set of guidelines for Free and Open Source software] that characterize the intentions of our community.
All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.
All software and content distributed by Sugar Labs, including activity bundles uploaded to http://activities.sugarlabs.org, must be released under a license that conforms to the principles and guidelines referred to above.
::: Yes. I agree... consistency. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:02, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
::: Yes. I agree... consistency. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:02, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
''Another nit pick: I find the second link to the GNU.org website distracting and unnecessary. I'd replace ''"is found on the [http://gnu.org GNU.org website]"'' with ''"is provided by the FSF"''. The FSF is mentioned again later, so it's better to use the same name. [[User:Bert|Bert]] 10:04, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
''Another nit pick: I find the second link to the GNU.org website distracting and unnecessary. I'd replace ''"is found on the [http://gnu.org GNU.org website]"'' with ''"is provided by the FSF"''. The FSF is mentioned again later, so it's better to use the same name. [[User:Bert|Bert]] 10:04, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:Nitpicking is right... but I made the change :) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:51, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
----
----
+1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
+1, having Fedora list of good licences will simplify workflow on ASLO to make it automatic, ie, activities-testing.sugarlabs.org [[Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing|sees]] to the {{Code|licence}} tag in the {{Code|activitiy.info}} to accept/reject any new upload. [[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 09:32, 24 June 2011 (EDT)