Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| | | |
| Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar. | | Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar. |
| + | |
| + | <s>look at : [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST). Thanks, added in next paragraph.</s> |
| : These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome. | | : These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome. |
| | | |
Line 93: |
Line 95: |
| | | |
| sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator | | sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator |
− | : adding -S forces ... wording is not to hand.
| + | To explain, |
| + | |
| + | we add an option, -S ( = --force-suggested) to force, using suggested dependencies |
| | | |
| Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you. | | Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you. |
Line 103: |
Line 107: |
| sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator | | sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator |
| | | |
| + | we can also add an option to the emulator, for example, |
| + | |
| + | sweets sdk/sugar:emulator -f |
| + | will ask the emulator to open, full screen. |
| + | |
| '''If you have Sugar running - Explore''' | | '''If you have Sugar running - Explore''' |
| | | |
Line 119: |
Line 128: |
| | | |
| the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages - @alsroot what changed? | | the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages - @alsroot what changed? |
| + | : Snip from IRC #sugar-newbies, [21:25] <alsroot> the sweet "base/x11-libs" had a bug that was found in mint |
| + | '''What would an experienced user do next?''' |
| | | |
− | '''What would an experienced user do next?'''
| + | I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, some investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present. |
| + | |
| + | Have I drawn the wrong conclusion? |
| | | |
− | I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, in this situation (in my experience) many investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present. Have I drawn the wrong conclusion?
| + | A question regarding -R option. Would the -R option eg: |
| + | sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator |
| + | be superfluous straight after {{code|sweets upgrade}}? |
| | | |
| I am currently in the above described situation with Sweets on Debian Wheezy. What is suggested here, I will test there. | | I am currently in the above described situation with Sweets on Debian Wheezy. What is suggested here, I will test there. |