Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Hope to post readable notes from our discussions at FUDCon here by the evening of Sept. 10. Please poke me if I dont! | + | ==Comments== |
| + | |
| + | Hope to post readable notes from our discussions at FUDCon here by the |
| + | evening of Sept. 10. Please poke me if I dont! |
| | | |
| [[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | | [[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
| + | |
| + | Please leave comments here or (better) relay them to the IAEP mailing-list. |
| + | |
| + | [[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 00:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC) |
| + | |
| + | ==Notes== |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | ===Telling stories=== |
| + | '''telling awesome stories to demonstrate the possibilities enabled by Sugar''' |
| + | |
| + | * Pentagram's help in designing the interface |
| + | * feedback process (once it's actually done) |
| + | * Sugar as s ''playground for innovation and experimentation'' (an inspiring comment Tomeu made during Q&A) |
| + | * two committees we shuld consider adding: |
| + | ** propaganda (ChristophD has been suggested for that role) |
| + | ** outreach |
| + | *** university/students liason |
| + | *** educators |
| + | |
| + | ===TO-DOs=== |
| + | |
| + | * '''find logo''' |
| + | * '''finding out who owns the rights to "Sugar" and "Sugar Labs"''' => we have to own the Sugar Labs brand and related entities |
| + | * '''have an organizational roadmap, not just a software roadmap''' |
| + | * set up feedback process |
| + | * make sure to follow-up on projects |
| + | * clean up wiki |
| + | * next release in 6-months should have the biggest holes fixed |
| + | * get an extra or two developers working on Sugar for 4 to 6 months |
| + | * testing: outsource it to organizations (ChristophD will talk to people at universities in Graz, Austria on September 21/22 so let's see what happens); requires strong leadership (!); Gnome bug-days as an example; push for automated testing |
| + | * emphasis on the importance of responding to bug-reports, even though we don't necessarily have to fix them |
| + | * understanding how community works -> make it better at Sugar Labs (find quick wins, proof-points) |
| + | * GdK: "simplify and amplify" |
| + | * responsibilities |
| + | * Sugar Labs Ambassadors (?) |
| + | * weekly updates to walter, but also try to spread to more publications (e.g. Sugar ported to Beagle board @ linuxdevices.com) |
| + | * focus on work planned for next week |
| + | * @IAEP: media liason to spread the story |
| + | * engage community via IAEP and Sugar to harness people |
| + | * IRC: weekly Sugar Labs meeting, infrequent Board meetings for high-level and sensitive issues such as business, hiring, etc., board meetings open to everyone - patches welcome, candidates have to keep motivated; not only board members can run committees but board holds people accountable |
| + | * set up Ministry of Propaganda / Outreach / Truth |
| + | * IRL meetings: e.g. FUDCon Boston |