Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | {{TOCright}} |
| + | ==DRAFT?== |
| + | |
| + | Maybe time to remove "DRAFT" from the page? |
| + | |
| ==Other examples== | | ==Other examples== |
| | | |
Line 22: |
Line 27: |
| :I've moved some of the details to subpages. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 16:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | | :I've moved some of the details to subpages. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 16:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
| | | |
− | == Decision Panels == | + | == [[Decision panels]] == |
| | | |
| This seems to be the most controversial topic: | | This seems to be the most controversial topic: |
Line 141: |
Line 146: |
| | | |
| --Mako | | --Mako |
| + | |
| + | To be a truly community based and perhaps a good 501c3 NonProfit, |
| + | it has to serve the public good, and including those community members |
| + | that are affected (i.e. users of the software, kids, teachers, |
| + | family members, community members, not just developers), |
| + | or underserved by the software/ product (those who don't get it, |
| + | i.e. people without machines that will boot from USB/ CDR, |
| + | and/or just learning what Sugar and SugarLabs/ OLPC is about), |
| + | as inclusion makes a better product and |
| + | better serves the public good. |
| + | |
| + | [[User:Danceswithcars|Danceswithcars]] 14:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC) |
| | | |
| == Other open details == | | == Other open details == |
Line 155: |
Line 172: |
| * limits on board membership by employer | | * limits on board membership by employer |
| * how money is disbursed. | | * how money is disbursed. |
| + | * how committees dissolve/end when they're no longer needed. |
| | | |
| == feedback from SFC == | | == feedback from SFC == |